On January 13th, during the talk show ‘Alternative Vision,’ Giorgi Kardava, a member of the newly-created ‘Conservative Movement,’ spoke about a recently released report by Human Rights Watch. The report stressed that in 2021, Georgia experienced a setback in the field of human rights, noting that the events of July 5th demonstrate the inability of the police to prevent violent incidents. Kardava noted that human rights violations in Georgia were more common during Saakashvili’s rule, referring to the events of November 7th and May 26th, as well as the situation in prisons. Kardava further stressed that it is incorrect to compare these events to July 5th, and if these actions were to be repeated, HRW would have no response to it.
Giorgi Kardava, Conservative Movement: “During Saakashvili’s rule, the events of November 7th, the raid on TV Imedi, the killing of people in the streets… The events of May 26th… Not to mention the unprecedented things that were happening in penitentiaries… Comparing these events to July 5th is like comparing different dimensions… If the same period was to come back, Human Rights Watch would not make such reports, if a total of 300,000 people were to go through it again, be it their repressive policies in prisons, or on the streets, or on other TV channels, Human Rights Watch would still label Georgia as a beacon of democracy. This capitalization on authorities, that, look, Human Rights Watch said something about us, is very outdated.”
The claim that Human Rights Watch would not have reacted to human rights abuses in Georgia during the rule of the previous government is manipulative. In fact, HRW prepared reports on both the events of November 7th, 2007 and the problems in the penitentiary system. In addition, HRW officials assessed the excessive use of force during the events of May 26th, 2011 as unacceptable. Human Rights Watch about November 7th, 2007
On December 19th, 2007, HRW published a 102-page report entitled “Crossing the Line: Georgia’s Violent Dispersal of Protesters and Raid Imedi Television.” The report concerned the violent events of November 7th, 2007.
The report stressed that the “government forces used violent and excessive force to disperse a series of largely peaceful demonstrations in the capital.” The report underscored that police used tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse the protesters and that most masked police officers chased away protesters of all ages, kicking them with sticks, batons and wooden sticks. The report refers to the raid on Imedi TV and assesses it as a restriction on freedom of expression.
Human Rights Watch, 2007: “The raid on and closure of Imedi television was a violation of Georgia’s commitments to guaranteeing freedom of expression. The legal basis for the decision to raid and close Imedi has been seriously called into question, and there is evidence to suggest that the legal basis was established after-the-fact and backdated.”
The report is based on interviews recorded by the organization with 35 participants and a representative of the Ministry of Internal Affairs during November 12-16, 2007, as well as responses received from the Prosecutor Office of Georgia. During the investigation, interviews were conducted with witnesses and victims of the dispersal, as well as with people who were inside or outside the “Imedi TV” building during the raid and witnessed the events live.
Notably, Holly Cartner, Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch stressed that “The November 7th police operations were not legitimate means of policing. They have done serious damage to Georgia’s reputation as a champion of human rights.” Cartner also noted that before November 7th, there were serious signs that the Georgian government was violating the basic principles of the rule of law and human rights.
|Year||Assessment of the problems in the Georgian penitentiaries|
|2012||“Overcrowding in prisons remains a problem, leading to poor prison conditions. The Ombudsman’s Office documented numerous cases of ill-treatment in prisons. In prison No. 2 in Kutaisi, inmates are forced to spend up to 24 hours in an empty two to three square meter cell wearing only their underwear as punishment for prison rules violations. The ombudsman called on the prosecutor’s office to investigate.
In a June report, Thomas Hammarberg, Council of Europe commissioner for human rights, welcomed the government’s efforts to reform the justice system, but urged the authorities to adopt a more human rights oriented criminal justice policy.”
|2011||“Prison overcrowding remains a problem, leading to poor conditions. Courts’ low number of acquittals is a key factor in overcrowding. In September the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment published a report on its February visit to Georgia, noting a number of positive developments, but expressing concern regarding little or no progress on overcrowding in Georgian prisons and lack of meaningful activities for prisoners.”|
|2010||“Prison overcrowding leading to poor conditions remains a problem, despite construction of new prisons and several presidential pardons and amnesties. Although official statistics showed a decrease in the use of pretrial detention, the total number of prisoners increased to 19,504 by June 2009, a more than 50 percent increase since 2006. The frequent use of consecutive custodial sentencing is largely responsible for this increase. Allegations of deliberate ill-treatment of prisoners continue, including at the newly-built prison near Tbilisi.”|
|2009||“The government has taken steps to reduce prison overcrowding, including issuing two presidential pardons and amnesties in 2008, and opening a new prison in Gldani. However, overuse of pretrial detention perpetuates overcrowding. As of October 1, 2008, the prison population totaled 19,929, a 50 percent increase in two years. In March the government closed the infamous Tbilisi Prison No. 5, which the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and human rights organizations had repeatedly criticized for its overcrowding and appalling conditions. Poor conditions persist in many facilities, and allegations of ill-treatment of prisoners continue, including at the new Gldani prison.”|
- Human Rights Watch about the Situation in the Georgian Penitentiaries
Human Rights Watch has been constantly responding to ongoing processes and violations of prisoners’ rights in Georgian prisons.
On September 13th, 2006, HRW published a report titled “Undue Punishment: Abuses against Prisoners in Georgia.”
The report claimed that despite the fact that the new government of Georgia initiated reforms in Georgian prisons, the documents presented in the report proved that human rights were still being harshly violated in the penitentiary system. The report also noted that most of the prisons were overcrowded, prisoners were malnourished, sometimes did not receive access at all or received poor quality medical care, and access to basic hygiene items was almost non-existent. The report further asserted that since December 2005, many prisoners have been beaten, ill-treated and sometimes tortured. On March 27th, 2006, 7 prisoners were killed and 17 were seriously injured as a result of a special operation carried out at the Fifth Penitentiary Institution in Tbilisi. The report is based on interviews with 110 inmates, government and non-government agencies carried out over the period of two weeks by an HRW team in Georgia. HRW researchers have personally visited several Georgian penitentiary facilities.
Notably, on October 25th, 2007, Human Rights Watch, in partnership with Amnesty International and Penal Reform International, called on the Georgian government to work more intensively towards ending torture and ill-treatment of prisoners in penitentiaries. A group of human rights organizations then drew attention to the fact that none of the participants in the special operation carried out on March 27th, 2006 in Tbilisi Penitentiary Establishment N5 had been charged. Holly Cartner said the delay in the investigation raised concerns and doubts as to whether establishing the truth was actually in the interests of the authorities.
The problems in the Georgian penitentiary system are also discussed in 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 reports on Georgia prepared by HRW. The reports are based on the findings of the Ombudsman of Georgia and international organizations such as the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT). Reports indicated that prison overcrowding remained a problem and that various human rights abuses still took place.Human Rights Watch About May 26, 2011
With regard to the events of May 26th, 2011, the same day, Human Rights Watch stressed that the government should’ve immediately launched a thorough and impartial investigation into the excessive and disproportionate use of force. Rachel Denber, HRW Deputy Director for Europe and Central Asia, called the events of May 26 unjustified.
Rachel Denber, Europe and Central Asia deputy director at Human Rights Watch: “Even if the Tbilisi demonstration was unauthorized, nothing can justify the beating of largely peaceful demonstrators.”
The events of May 26th were also included in HRW’s 2012 report, stating that on May 26th, 2011, police used rubber bullets, tear gas and water cannons against protesters. 160 demonstrators were arrested, many beaten, including those who did not resist. According to HRW, police obstructed the activities of Georgian and foreign journalists, physically and verbally abusing at least ten of them, and arrested two of them.
Manipulative claims that the US, EU and non-governmental organizations did not react to the human rights violations during the UNM era are rather common. For more on the topic, see the articles prepared by “Myth Detector:”
- Were CSOs Reacting to Human Rights Violations before 2012?
- Why has Irakli Garibashvili never Heard Western Criticism of the UNM-Era Judiciary?
- Disinformation as if the US did not React to Human Rights Violations During the UNM Era
The article has been written in the framework of Facebook’s fact-checking program. You can read more about the restrictions that Facebook may impose based on this article via this link. You can find information about appealing or editing our assessment via this link.